To have and to hold: When an engagement goes belly up, who gets to keep the ring?

1 week ago 9

A communicative successful this masthead connected Monday has sparked fierce statement astir meal tables crossed the country. It recounted a bittersweet tale of ruptured love, breached dreams, alleged infidelity and maltreatment and a ineligible squabble implicit who gets to support a two-carat engagement ring.

In the County Court of Victoria, Constantinos Hatzis is demanding his erstwhile fiancee Anastasia Soulios instrumentality a two-carat diamond ringing and different jewellery worthy much than $100,000.

Con Hatzis and erstwhile fiancee Anastasia Soulios.

Soulios has claimed successful defence documents that Hatzis was unfaithful during their two-year narration and repeatedly subjected her to abuse, which absolves her of immoderate ineligible work to manus backmost the ring.

I sought the sentiment of a household tribunal lawyer with extended acquisition dealing with marital breakdowns astir who mightiness triumph successful the lawsuit of the bling ring.

“It’s a precise atrocious look to spell earlier a justice and request the ringing backmost ... courts don’t similar that.” She suggested some parties should hold that immoderate talented jewellery was that, a gift, and “leave the rings wherever they lie”.

Let’s pat into different opinion. What would the Hollywood star, Elizabeth Taylor, who was engaged 10 times and joined eight, reckon? Her flashiest ring, the Krupp diamond, was fixed to her by Richard Burton. A acquisition and not an authoritative engagement ring, it weighed successful astatine a finger-bolstering 33.2 carats and is estimated to beryllium worthy astir $US10 cardinal ($15 million) successful today’s money.

So, what did Liz bash with the dozens of rings, brooches, bracelets, and different pieces of jewellery she accumulated implicit the people of her peripatetic marital career? Easy. She kept them each and adjacent wrote a publication astir her favourite pieces. Following her decease successful 2011, the legendary postulation was auctioned off, fetching implicit $US156 cardinal ($235 million).

So, a household lawyer and a movie prima concur – err connected the broadside of gifts being kept by their recipients. But what’s this psychologist’s view? What bash I deliberation our tawdry communicative tells america astir narration split-ups and however to navigate them emotionally?

Reading this story, what I chiefly detected was choler and its adjacent affectional relative revenge, feelings that look to beryllium arsenic experienced by some sides of this dispute. That is astonishing arsenic usually, successful breakups, determination is simply a leaver and a leavee.

The latter, experiencing the results of romanticist rejection, often feels their choler and revenge much powerfully. But it sounds similar these 2 are arsenic pissed disconnected astatine each other.

Anger, the 2nd signifier successful the well-known Kubler-Ross grief model, is simply a mean absorption to immoderate loss, including narration breakdowns. Thoughts of “How did this hap to me?” promote a consciousness of victimhood and blaming. It’s casual to get stuck successful a rhythm of rumination of however your ex has wronged you.

Anger’s playmate, revenge, is simply a astir funny and pervasive emotion. Social commentator Fran Lebowitz claims to bask her revenge served astatine immoderate somesthesia and admits to hanging connected to her grudges “forever”. But is revenge, similar taking your ex to tribunal to request the instrumentality of gifts, a bully idea?

Revenge is usually driven by anger, but is yet fuelled by anticipated restitution oregon enjoyment. Studies person recovered that portion determination whitethorn beryllium archetypal satisfaction, revenge really perpetuates the symptom of the archetypal offence. Additionally, revenge encourages a rhythm of retaliation.

Confucius sagaciously said, “Before you embark connected a travel of revenge, excavation 2 graves.”

Letting spell of the impulse for revenge is hard work. But staying aggravated and plotting vengeance keeps you locked successful bitterness and a consciousness of injustice. It’s amended to determination connected with empathy, compassion and forgiveness, though that is, admittedly, easier said than done. Ultimately, however, it’s the healthier option.

When I archetypal work this story, I sensed the choler and impulse for revenge. But I besides detected different emotions bubbling nether the surface. Once upon a time, these star-crossed lovers indispensable person truly been into each other. After all, she gave him a $10,000 ticker and helium gave her the bling ring. You don’t splurge similar that connected radical astir whom you’re ambivalent.

It’s besides worthy remembering what this portion of jewellery specifically signifies wrong a relationship. Unlike a bully ticker oregon costly necklace, an engagement ringing signals an accrued level of committedness wrong a relationship. It implicitly tells the idiosyncratic being projected to that the idiosyncratic popping the question wants to walk the remainder of their beingness with them, and that they are committed to being successful a loving, respectful relationship.

I’m hearing, successful the lavishness of the gifts they gave each other, the ebbing echo of the love, passionateness and devotion they’d antecedently felt. What a pity to suffer that.

My proposal is this: emergence supra the hurt, fto spell of your choler and tendency for revenge, effort to retrieve the bully times, and determination on.

So, I hold with the household lawyer and the movie prima – she keeps the ring.

Peter Quarry is simply a retired scientist and writer.

The Opinion newsletter is simply a play wrapper of views that volition challenge, champion and pass your own. Sign up here.